[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150707073456.2a6014b2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 07:34:56 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:49:09 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2015 02:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > kernel/sched/core.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 2ecd9d29abb1 ("sched, preempt_notifier: separate notifier
> > registration from static_key inc/dec")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 6efde1d3716b ("sched/preempt, kvm: Fix KVM preempt_notifier
> > usage")
> >
> > from the tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (maybe - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary (no action is required).
>
> The commit from the tip tree is obsolete.
And has now been removed from the tip tree, so we won't see that
conflict today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists