[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:38:38 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...an.com, treding@...dia.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulators: Add missing dummy definition for
regulator_list_voltage
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:06:50PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> +static inline int regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator *regulator, unsigned selector)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
I'd expect this stub to return -EINVAL since the voltage count should be
zero for !REGULATOR (since we obviously can't count the number of
voltages).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists