[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559D29B9.2080408@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:46:33 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
body
> Is there truly no way to simplify that process?
I see some software development possibilities which could improve
the communication with high volume mailing lists.
> You should be sending the patches directly with SMTP using git-send-email,
This tool is also fine for the publishing of a lot of patches.
> if you're not, then you're making things overly complicated for yourself.
But I prefer a graphical user interface for my mail handling so far.
> Having a feature doesn't mean that it should be used.
Does any of the "questionable functionality" get occasionally overlooked
a bit too often?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists