[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708150335.GB20551@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:03:35 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
body
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:05:53PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> If multiple people are submitting identical changes, then the one that
> is applied is the one the maintainer sees first, which will most
> likely be determined by which one hit their inbox / list first. Nobody
> is going to look at timestamps in emails to determine which one will
> be applied.
And some maintainers may choose *not* to act on a patch first, even if
they see it first. They might be focused on bug fix patches, and not
act on cleanup or feature patches until -rc3 or rc4. Or maybe they
will use separate branches for "urgent_for_linus" patches, so two
different patchs may end up in completely different git flows.
> If you're worried about which one of several versions of a patch will
> be applied, change the subject to [PATCH v2] ..... instead of [PATCH]
> .... for the second version.
*Please* do this. In fact, this is the one thing I wish git
send-email would do automatically, along with having a place to edit
and track the 0/N summary patch.
> >> To be honest, I've only ever used that timestamp for reporting
> >> purposes at work, and I'd be surprised if anyone was doing anything
> >> other than that with them.
> >
> > Thanks for your detailed feedback.
Note also that some maintainers have work flow that deliberately smash
the date (i.e., because they are using a system such as guilt), so if
you are depending on the submitted timestamp, it's going to break on
you.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists