[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559D416A.7050601@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:27:38 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
body
> Note also that some maintainers have work flow that deliberately smash
> the date (i.e., because they are using a system such as guilt),
> so if you are depending on the submitted timestamp, it's going to
> break on you.
Thanks for your hint.
I am just trying to offer the possibility for the reuse of a more
precise commit timestamp together with an appropriate author mail
address for my update suggestions.
Do you reject any more such message field overrides?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists