| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:47:04 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver On 09-07-15, 09:55, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > That's what I did in previous version. But the reason I use the device- > driver model is to handle the defer probing issue. Since there's no > arch/arm64/mach-mediatek/ directory to hold the device registration > code anymore, no device tree way to match cpufreq driver > (please correct me if there's any), and initcall seems not handle > defer probing either, therefore I put both device and driver > registration in this function. I know it's crappy. :( > Do you have any suggestion to do it right and handle defer probing > properly? Sounds reasonable. Just add proper comment in code to explain that. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists