linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm, oom: organize oom context into struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:56:02 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakobunt@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm, oom: organize oom context into struct

On Wed 08-07-15 16:38:25, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > 
> > There are essential elements to an oom context that are passed around to
> > multiple functions.
> > 
> > Organize these elements into a new struct, struct oom_context, that
> > specifies the context for an oom condition.
> > 
> > This patch introduces no functional change.
> > 
> > [mhocko@...e.cz: s@..._control@..._context@]
> > [mhocko@...e.cz: do not initialize on stack oom_context with NULL or 0]
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> 
> I hate to appear to be nacking my own patch, but it was correct when 
> included in my series

What is incorrect in this patch?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/