[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1436409938.3477.31.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 04:45:38 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Significant performance difference for postgres w/o
sched_autogroup
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 17:45 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Workload:
>
> postgresql (multi-process via shared memory SQL server) and benchmark
> client (pgbench, multi threaded) running on the same server. Connected
> using unix sockets. The statements are relatively simple (~1.5ms on
> average), forcing frequent back/forth between server processes and
> pgbench threads.
>
> I found that disabling sched_autogroup *significantly* reduces
> throughput. Even when both server and client are started from the same
> terminal and thus should be in the same group!
>
> There's a significant difference in how %sys with autogroups
> enabled/disabled. ~8% v ~27%. That sounds too much.
Seems reasonable to me. 1(tg)/2(tgs) > 1(task)/N(tasks), throughput is
what the server can sustain on its given budget, larger budget means
less client blockage, thus less %sys.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists