[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150710115332.GG26095@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:23:32 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@...il.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jan Willeke <willeke@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] uprobes/x86: Reimplement
arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> [2015-07-07 03:22:58]:
> Add the x86-specific version of arch_uretprobe_is_alive() helper.
> It returns true if the stack frame mangled by prepare_uretprobe()
> is still on stack. So if it returns false, we know that the probed
> function has already returned.
>
> We add the new return_instance->stack member and change the generic
> code to initialize it in prepare_uretprobe, but it should be equally
> useful for other architectures.
>
> TODO: this assumes that the probed application can't use multiple
> stacks (say sigaltstack). We will try to improve this logic later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists