[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150710115538.GH26095@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:25:38 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@...il.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jan Willeke <willeke@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush
the frames invalidated by longjmp()
> Change handle_trampoline() to unwind ->return_instances until we know
> that the next chain is alive or NULL, this ensures that the current
> chain is the last we need to report and free.
>
> Alternatively, every return_instance could use unique trampoline_vaddr,
> in this case we could use it as a key. And this could solve the problem
> with sigaltstack() automatically.
>
> But this approach needs more changes, and it puts the "hard" limit on
> MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH. Plus it can not solve another problem partially
> fixed by the next patch.
>
> Note: this change has no effect on !x86, the arch-agnostic version of
> arch_uretprobe_is_alive() just returns "true".
>
> TODO: as documented by the previous change, arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
> can be fooled by sigaltstack/etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists