[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1436554227.2658.161.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:50:27 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Pledge Roy-R01356 <roy.pledge@...escale.com>
CC: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA BMan device management
driver
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 13:29 -0500, Pledge Roy-R01356 wrote:
> > return in_be32((void *)bm + offset);
> > > ^
> > > [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c: In function ‘__bm_out’:
> > > [...]/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman.c:172:2: error: implicit declaration
> > > of function ‘out_be32’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > out_be32((void *)bm + offset, val);
> >
> > These PPCisms will need to be fixed. LS1043A is an ARM chip with DPAA
> > 1.0.
>
> LS1043 (ARM, Little Endian) support is still work in progress. The patches
> for that are being tested now but are based on the SDK version of the
> driver and will need to be massaged in order to get them applied here. Our
> plan of record is to add upstream support for this at a later time.
If you're already reworking this for upstream acceptance, why not fix the
more obvious PPCisms now?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists