[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hfv4vals1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:51:42 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/14] 3.10.84-stable review
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>>
>> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.84 release.
>> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > let me know.
>>
>> Boot test results from kernelci.org below. Note that the boot failures
>> found are not new failures in this version, so should not block release.
>
> Anything we should be backporting to resolve those failures? Or does
> this kernel version just not really matter for those platforms?
We're looking into the failures now, and will submit any backports
needed. However, I think these remaining failures are just things that
never worked in v3.10, and we're finding as we add platforms to
kernelci.org. In those cases, we'll just blacklist those from testing
on v3.10.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists