linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/14] 3.10.84-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150710173447.GG10580@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:34:47 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/14] 3.10.84-stable review

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:36AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.84 release.
> > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> Boot test results from kernelci.org below. Note that the boot failures
> found are not new failures in this version, so should not block release.

Anything we should be backporting to resolve those failures?  Or does
this kernel version just not really matter for those platforms?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/