linux-kernel - Re: Gemini Soc timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9777530.lnQDW33Iqo@wuerfel>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:06:03 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Gemini Soc timers

On Friday 10 July 2015 10:48:26 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >> As usual they are just keeping it out of mainline, and this
> >> is adding sched_clock() and other goodies so should
> >> probably be upstreamed ASAP.
> >
> >
> > This is what I initially submitted here.
> 
> Ah. I missed part of the start of the discussion it seems.
> 
> > But Arnd wanted to see a smaller patch which only fixes gemini timer issue
> > (t.i. shed clock being 100Hz instead of 25MHz).
> > Also I've submitted 4.1 support yesterday, but patches didn't change much
> > comparing to 3.18
> 
> On the other hand I think the bigger patch is OK actually.
> 
> I rewrote the timer support some time back and did not get
> anyone to test it properly at the time, so the patch went in
> untested. So this is a fix.

The bigger patch seemed a little too verbose to have it backported
to stable kernels, so I asked for a minimal fix that could be marked
as stable, with the other changes applied on top for the current
arm-soc tree.

I'm still on parental leave and not dealing with patches directly,
so whichever patch we want should get routed through Ulli to arm@...nel.org

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/