linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/45] clk: samsung: Properly include clk.h and clkdev.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55A42299.3040809@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:42:01 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
CC:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/45] clk: samsung: Properly include clk.h and clkdev.h

On 07/11/2015 12:07 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> W dniu 11.07.2015 o 08:33, Stephen Boyd pisze:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>> index 0117238391d6..f38a6c49f744 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
>>    * clock framework for Samsung platforms.
>>   */
>>   
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>> index b775fc29caa5..aa872d2c5105 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>> @@ -13,10 +13,11 @@
>>   #ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>   #define __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>   
>> -#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include "clk-pll.h"
>>   
>> +struct clk;
>> +
> Hmmm... why? Including clk-provider (which declares struct clk in your
> last patch) is not sufficient?
>

I hope to eventually remove the forward declaration of struct clk in 
clk-provider.h too. That will take some more time though. I can leave 
this part out of the patch if you like and add it back when that work is 
done, it doesn't matter to me.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/