linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/45] clk: samsung: Properly include clk.h and clkdev.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <55A44DD3.9020005@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:46:27 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/45] clk: samsung: Properly include clk.h and clkdev.h

On 14.07.2015 05:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 12:07 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> W dniu 11.07.2015 o 08:33, Stephen Boyd pisze:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> index 0117238391d6..f38a6c49f744 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
>>>    * clock framework for Samsung platforms.
>>>   */
>>>   +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>   #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>>>   diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> index b775fc29caa5..aa872d2c5105 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
>>> @@ -13,10 +13,11 @@
>>>   #ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>>   #define __SAMSUNG_CLK_H
>>>   -#include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>>   #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>>   #include "clk-pll.h"
>>>   +struct clk;
>>> +
>> Hmmm... why? Including clk-provider (which declares struct clk in your
>> last patch) is not sufficient?
>>
> 
> I hope to eventually remove the forward declaration of struct clk in
> clk-provider.h too. That will take some more time though. I can leave
> this part out of the patch if you like and add it back when that work is
> done, it doesn't matter to me.

Thanks for explanation, it's fine as it is.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/