linux-kernel - [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:28:28 +0530
From:	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo

rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
timed-power-on(tpo). However some Power platforms like BML use a fake
rtc clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the
missing 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.

Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.

This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
index 7061dca..1125641 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
@@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
+static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
 	.read_time	= opal_get_rtc_time,
 	.set_time	= opal_set_rtc_time,
-	.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time,
-	.set_alarm	= opal_set_tpo_time,
 };
 
 static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
-						 NULL))
+						 NULL)) {
 		device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
+		opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time;
+		opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time;
+	}
 
 	rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
 				       THIS_MODULE);
-- 
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/