[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A5D51B.8050306@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:35:55 +0900
From: "SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@....com)" <cleaneye.kim@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Sleep: Use workqueue for user space wakeup
sources garbage collector
On 2015-07-03 오후 2:03, SungEun Kim(cleaneye.kim@....com) wrote:
> On 2015-07-03 오전 9:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 05:28:48 PM SungEun Kim wrote:
>>> From: "SungEun Kim" <cleaneye.kim@....com>
>>>
>>> The synchronous synchronize_rcu in wakeup_source_remove makes user
>> process
>>> which writes to /sys/kernel/wake_unlock blocked sometimes.
>>>
>>> For example, when android eventhub tries to release wakelock,
>>> this blocking process can occur, and eventhub can't get input event
>>> for a while.
>>>
>>> Using workqueue instead of direct function call at pm_wake_unlock
>>> can prevent this unnecessary delay of an user space process.
>>
>> The idea is defendable, but the patch is too simple.
>>
>> For example, if the garbage collection is in progress, it is not useful
>> to start a new one.
>>
>> Also the incrementation and clearing of wakelocks_gc_count should be under
>> the lock.
>
> Thank you for your advices.
> I will correct and amend my patch and then submit v3 patch.
>
> Thank you.
> SungEun Kim
>
Dear Wysocki,
I've submit patch v3.
Could you review patch v3?
Thank you.
SungEun Kim
>>
>>
>> --
>> I speak only for myself.
>> Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists