[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150715040703.GA545@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:07:03 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zsmalloc: do not take class lock in
zs_pages_to_compact()
On (07/11/15 18:45), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> We re-do this calculations during compaction on a per class basis
> anyway.
>
> zs_unregister_shrinker() will not return until we have an active
> shrinker, so classes won't unexpectedly disappear while
> zs_pages_to_compact(), invoked by zs_shrinker_count(), iterates
> them.
>
> When called from zram, we are protected by zram's ->init_lock,
> so, again, classes will be there until zs_pages_to_compact()
> iterates them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/zsmalloc.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index b10a228..824c182 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -1811,9 +1811,7 @@ unsigned long zs_pages_to_compact(struct zs_pool *pool)
> if (class->index != i)
> continue;
>
> - spin_lock(&class->lock);
> pages_to_free += zs_can_compact(class);
> - spin_unlock(&class->lock);
> }
>
> return pages_to_free;
This patch still makes sense. Agree?
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists