[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150715165954.GA19828@dtor-ws>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:59:54 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: cpaul@...hat.com
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i8042: Add unmask_kbd_data option
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:46:48AM -0400, cpaul@...hat.com wrote:
> +static int i8042_kbd_bind_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = data;
> + struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
> + struct i8042_port *port = serio->port_data;
> +
> + if (serio != i8042_ports[I8042_KBD_PORT_NO].serio)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (action) {
> + case BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER:
> + port->driver_bound = true;
> + break;
> +
> + case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
I think it should be BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER so that we see the KBD
data as it goes through driver cleanup. Yell if you disagree, or I'll
change it locally.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists