[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150715.211916.1258342954251964451.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: decui@...rosoft.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de,
apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
pebolle@...cali.nl
Subject: Re: [V2 6/7] hvsock: introduce Hyper-V VM Sockets feature
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:00:48 -0700
> + pr_debug("hvsock_sk_destruct: called\n");
Debug logging just to state that a function is called is not appropriate,
we have very sophisticated tracing facilities in the kernel that can do
that transparently, and more.
PLease remove this.
> + if (hvsk->channel) {
> + pr_debug("hvsock_sk_destruct: calling vmbus_close()\n");
Likewise, these kinds of debug logs are totally inappropriate.
> +static int hvsock_release(struct socket *sock)
> +{
> + /* sock->sk is NULL, if accept() is interrupted by a signal */
> + if (sock->sk) {
> + __hvsock_release(sock->sk);
> + sock->sk = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + sock->state = SS_FREE;
> + pr_debug("hvsock_release called\n\n");
Likewise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists