[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A7829C.5040606@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:08:28 +0100
From: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>
CC: "forest@...ttletooquiet.net" <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"gclement@...bob.org" <gclement@...bob.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] staging:vt6655: remove checks around dev_kfree_skb
On 16/07/15 09:54, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:45:06AM +0000, Maninder Singh wrote:
>> where we are checking for (pTDInfo->skb), we are using it in above line.
>> and it does not look good, thats why we should remove thse checks and i have suggested
>> changes.
>>
>> code snippet:-
>> -----------------------
>>
>> if (pTDInfo->skb_dma && (pTDInfo->skb_dma != pTDInfo->buf_dma))
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is allocated after ->skb so if ->skb_dma is non-NULL then ->skb is
> also non-NULL.
>
>> dma_unmap_single(&pDevice->pcid->dev, pTDInfo->skb_dma,
>> pTDInfo->skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
> Is this a static checker warning? If so then it's a false positive.
>
This is old code dma_unmap_single never happens and is to be removed.
pTDInfo->skb now originates from mac80211.
I am in the process of tiding up pTDInfo that removes skb_dma.
In the past, this driver several API's sharing the same device now it
has just one.
Regards
Malcolm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists