[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fv4mn7v9.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:04:10 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"olaf\@aepfle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jasowang\@redhat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"driverdev-devel\@linuxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stephen\@networkplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"apw\@canonical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"pebolle\@tiscali.nl" <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Subject: Re: [V2 6/7] hvsock: introduce Hyper-V VM Sockets feature
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> writes:
>> From: David Miller
>> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:19
>>
>> From: Dexuan Cui
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:00:48 -0700
>>
>> > + pr_debug("hvsock_sk_destruct: called\n");
>>
>> Debug logging just to state that a function is called is not appropriate,
>> we have very sophisticated tracing facilities in the kernel that can do
>> that transparently, and more.
>>
>> Please remove this.
> OK.
>
>> > + if (hvsk->channel) {
>> > + pr_debug("hvsock_sk_destruct: calling vmbus_close()\n");
>>
>> Likewise, these kinds of debug logs are totally inappropriate.
> OK, I'll remove all the pr_debug() in the patch.
>
I'd suggest we rather use something like net_dbg_ratelimited()
intead. The driver is new so issues are expected. Some debugging may
be useful)
[...]
--
Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists