linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150720132831.GA1645@sudip-PC>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:58:32 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:59:29PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > We were dereferencing dev first and then checking if it is NULL. Lets
> > check for NULL first and then dereference.
> 
> The code is bonkers. Testing for a lack of a correctly constructed
> debugfs seq_file inside the debugfs seq_file callback is inane.
I missed seeing before sending this patch that there are some more
places where this has been done.
Then are you suggesting to remove the test?

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/