linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150720222100.7d838742@bbrezillon>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:21:00 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:08:19 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:49:13PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > > > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)
> 
> > > I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it?  It
> > > was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC.
> 
> > I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes
> > have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper
> > way to smoothly get all of them in the same release.
> 
> I see.  We should at least try to get the enable one in this time, I'd

Actually I was wrong about that patch: it depends on patch 1/15 of the
RFC ("pwm: add the pwm_is_enabled() helper").

> like to just apply it and then either do a cross tree merge for the one
> making use of the new functionality or (if the rest of the series gets
> held up for some reason) just letting it get merged via Linus' tree.
> 
> > I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing
> > Lee's work [1].
> 
> > Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into
> > account.
> 
> > Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm
> > branch ?
> > If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on
> > top of this topic branch.
> 
> I think that's fine for me, I can tag the PWM branch in my tree and
> Thierry can pull that.



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/