linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150720200819.GN11162@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:08:19 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:49:13PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:

> > > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)

> > I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it?  It
> > was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC.

> I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes
> have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper
> way to smoothly get all of them in the same release.

I see.  We should at least try to get the enable one in this time, I'd
like to just apply it and then either do a cross tree merge for the one
making use of the new functionality or (if the rest of the series gets
held up for some reason) just letting it get merged via Linus' tree.

> I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing
> Lee's work [1].

> Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into
> account.

> Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm
> branch ?
> If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on
> top of this topic branch.

I think that's fine for me, I can tag the PWM branch in my tree and
Thierry can pull that.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)