lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:09:05 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Yann Cantin <yann.cantin@...oste.net>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC ebeam PATCH 2/2] input: misc: New USB eBeam input driver

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:40:33PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 03:26:40PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 02:59:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:03:19PM +0200, Yann Cantin wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yann Cantin <yann.cantin@...oste.net>
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* sysfs setup */
> > > > +	err = sysfs_create_group(&intf->dev.kobj, &ebeam_attr_group);
> > > 
> > > Ick, you just added the sysfs files to the USB device, not your input
> > > device, are you sure you tested this?
> > > 
> > > And there should be a race-free way to add an attribute group to an
> > > input device, as this is, you are adding them to the device _after_ it
> > > is created, so userspace will not see them at creation time, causing a
> > > race.
> > 
> > No, there are no driver-specific attributed on input devices themselves,
> > they belong to the actual hardware devices. The input devices only
> > export standard attributes applicable to every and all input devices
> > in the system.
> 
> Then the Documentation in this patch better be fixed up, as it points to
> the input device as having these sysfs files :)
> 
> But as these are input device attributes, and not USB device interface
> attributes, putting them on the USB interface doesn't make much sense,
> and as I pointed out, is racy.  Why can't input devices have
> driver-specific attributes?  Why does input devices add their own
> attributes sometimes (like in psmouse, which does so in a racy way) yet
> this driver shouldn't do that?
> 
> Hm, nevermind about psmouse, that happens on the parent device too it
> seems (a serio device), not the input device, so it is "consistent", but
> not something I really like...

I think it is historical as quite often they (attributes) affect the
hardware itself, not behavior of input interface. And so they were
always placed on hardware level, not input device level.

Anyway, I do not think you are going to win your war on sysfs attributes
created post-device creation. We just need to recognize that there are
attributes that are created by the driver when it is bound to the
device. Maybe we need to revisit the idea about emitting special uevent
when driver is fully bound to a device and interested userspace can
start using it.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ