[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55AE0803.10603@mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:51:15 +0300
From: Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>
To: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ac100@...ts.launchpad.net, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Julian Andres Klode <jak@...-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dt: paz00: define nvec as child of i2c bus
On 21.07.2015 11:25, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> I think in this case it would be better to leave nvec and dt as it is for now,
> and just add the slave function to tegra-i2c. Otherwise we will again have two
> different "nvidia,nvec-slave" bindings (one for the intermediate hack and one
> for the final representation). As an alternative, you could also add slave
> function and port nvec in the same series.
>
First patch only adds slave functionality to tegra-i2c driver. I sent v3
to fix only tegra-i2c as Wolfram suggested.
Unfortunately I haven't fixed all defects and I will resend patch(es).
I can resend only first patch (for tegra-i2c) if it is more obvious for
everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists