linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dt: paz00: define nvec as child of i2c bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:57:32 +0200
From:	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
To:	Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Julian Andres Klode <jak@...-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dt: paz00: define nvec as child of i2c bus

Am Dienstag, 21. Juli 2015, 11:51:15 schrieb Andrey Danin:
> On 21.07.2015 11:25, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> > I think in this case it would be better to leave nvec and dt as it is for
> > now, and just add the slave function to tegra-i2c. Otherwise we will
> > again have two different "nvidia,nvec-slave" bindings (one for the
> > intermediate hack and one for the final representation). As an
> > alternative, you could also add slave function and port nvec in the same
> > series.
> 
> First patch only adds slave functionality to tegra-i2c driver. I sent v3
> to fix only tegra-i2c as Wolfram suggested.
> 
> Unfortunately I haven't fixed all defects and I will resend patch(es).
> I can resend only first patch (for tegra-i2c) if it is more obvious for
> everyone.

It's up to you. I think if the NV guys are ok with the tegra i2c change, 
Wolfram can merge it right away for 4.3. Not sure about the state of the nvec 
changes though and if they can be ready soon.

Marc

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)