[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUULyUXd7j96no=e6W=TZOpo+FNizfGweWqLJck0a8wXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:08:50 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Remove the b2b parameter from nmi_handle
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> It has never had any effect. Remove it for comprehensibility.
>
> Cc'd to stable because whatever to do with improve the NMI mess will
> probably depend on this.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Peter, if you've already queued this up, can you remove the Cc: stable
and the comment about stable? I have a totally different short-term
fix for the back-to-back NMI mess. I make no guarantee at all that
it's a full fix, but it fixes the case my test exercises quite nicely.
I still think this patch makes sense as a cleanup.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists