[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150721211731.GA3691@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:17:31 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/19] PCI/MSI: Let pci_msi_get_domain use struct
device's msi_domain
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:16:41PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Now that we can easily find which MSI domain a PCI device is
> using, use dev_get_msi_domain as a way to retrieve the information.
>
> The original code is still used as a fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index ef4ec6e..c77fdaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_msi_get_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>
> - if (dev->bus->msi)
> + domain = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
> + if (!domain && dev->bus->msi)
> domain = dev->bus->msi->domain;
> if (!domain)
> domain = arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
I think this would be slightly easier to read as:
struct irq_domain *domain;
domain = dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->dev);
if (domain)
return domain;
if (dev->bus->msi && (domain = dev->bus->msi->domain))
return domain;
return arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
I'm not a huge fan of assignments inside "if" conditions, and checkpatch
might even complain about it, but it exposes the fallback order pretty well
here. I guess we could also just repeat the dev->bus->msi->domain
expression:
if (dev->bus->msi && dev->bus->msi->domain)
return dev->bus->msi->domain;
We can at least get rid of the superfluous initialization of domain to
NULL.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists