[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150722044531.GC6345@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:45:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/21] x86/hweight: Add stack frame dependency for
__arch_hweight*()
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:39:23PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> So your shiny perf profile shows cumulative time in whatever called
> them. Sure, this is arguably silly if we're stuck with frame
> pointers.
You can count 20ish cycles tops for any one of them.
At least that was from the last time when comparing POPCNT perf to the
__sw_hweight* ones. IOW, POPCNT didn't show any improvement vs those sw
versions.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists