linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization contributions of dying tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150722065101.GA719@leoy-linaro>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:51:01 +0800
From:	Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
	yuyang.du@...el.com, mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
	pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 11/46] sched: Remove blocked load and utilization
 contributions of dying tasks

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:23:54PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Tasks being dequeued for the last time (state == TASK_DEAD) are dequeued
> with the DEQUEUE_SLEEP flag which causes their load and utilization
> contributions to be added to the runqueue blocked load and utilization.
> Hence they will contain load or utilization that is gone away. The issue
> only exists for the root cfs_rq as cgroup_exit() doesn't set
> DEQUEUE_SLEEP for task group exits.
> 
> If runnable+blocked load is to be used as a better estimate for cpu
> load the dead task contributions need to be removed to prevent
> load_balance() (idle_balance() in particular) from over-estimating the
> cpu load.
> 
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 775b0c7..fa12ce5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3217,6 +3217,8 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  	 * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
>  	 */
>  	update_curr(cfs_rq);
> +	if (entity_is_task(se) && task_of(se)->state == TASK_DEAD)
> +		flags &= !DEQUEUE_SLEEP;

So flags will be set to zero? Could be replaced by "flags &= ~DEQUEUE_SLEEP"?

>  	dequeue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
>  
>  	update_stats_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/