[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55AF822F.8060507@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:44:47 -0500
From: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kishon@...com>, <rogerq@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Update driver to support without regulators
On 07/21/2015 02:39 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
> On 07/21/2015 06:40 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 14 July 2015 at 21:29, Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com> wrote:
>>> From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>>>
>>> Update driver to support without regulators.
>>>
>>> Without this patch boards that do not enable regulator config options will
>>> fail to boot with a kernel panic.
>> I guess that's because the rootfs is mounted on the card that doesn't
>> get detected, right?
> No at ramfs was used to validate this and was loaded via ethernet in U-boot.
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt | 2 ++
>>> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> index 76bf087..2408e87 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ti-omap-hsmmc.txt
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ ti,dual-volt: boolean, supports dual voltage cards
>>> ti,non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC)
>>> ti,needs-special-reset: Requires a special softreset sequence
>>> ti,needs-special-hs-handling: HSMMC IP needs special setting for handling High Speed
>>> +voltage-ranges: Specify the voltage range supported if regulator framework
>>> +isn't enabled.
>>> dmas: List of DMA specifiers with the controller specific format
>>> as described in the generic DMA client binding. A tx and rx
>>> specifier is required.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> index b2b411d..16c870f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
>>> @@ -1551,10 +1551,13 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>> if (ios->power_mode != host->power_mode) {
>>> switch (ios->power_mode) {
>>> case MMC_POWER_OFF:
>>> - mmc_pdata(host)->set_power(host->dev, 0, 0);
>>> + if (host->use_reg)
>>> + mmc_pdata(host)->set_power(host->dev, 0, 0);
>>> break;
>>> case MMC_POWER_UP:
>>> - mmc_pdata(host)->set_power(host->dev, 1, ios->vdd);
>>> + if (host->use_reg)
>>> + mmc_pdata(host)->set_power(host->dev, 1,
>>> + ios->vdd);
>>> break;
>>> case MMC_POWER_ON:
>>> do_send_init_stream = 1;
>>> @@ -2082,10 +2085,13 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_irq;
>>> host->use_reg = 1;
>>> + mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_pdata(host)->ocr_mask;
>>> + } else {
>>> + ret = mmc_of_parse_voltage(pdev->dev.of_node, &mmc->ocr_avail);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_irq;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - mmc->ocr_avail = mmc_pdata(host)->ocr_mask;
>>> -
>>> omap_hsmmc_disable_irq(host);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> No, I don't like this patch. If your board have regulators which can
>> be used to find out the voltage levels, we shall use them. We shall
>> not use DT to workaround this.
>>
>> So, perhaps the Kconfig section for omap_hsmmc should select
>> CONFIG_REGULATOR (and friends)?
> Looking at the code the "ifdefCONFIG_REGULATOR" and the usage of use_reg
> (use regulator) shows that this driver is suppose to support boards that
> don't have the regulator framework enabled.
>
> This patches insures that this driver can work without the regulator framework
> which is currently broken.
Hi Ulf,
Just to clarify do you have an issue with this patch or in general
you rather nothave !CONFIG_REGULATOR supported? If its the latter
then wouldit be better to remove the !CONFIG_REGULATOR portion from
this driver all together.
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists