[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpVh3EDJLX--h3H4qa4EDy2nDJQeRZtPQ8+uU9K43b_Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:07:52 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kishon <kishon@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: Update driver to support without regulators
[...]
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Just to clarify do you have an issue with this patch or in general
> you rather nothave !CONFIG_REGULATOR supported? If its the latter
> then wouldit be better to remove the !CONFIG_REGULATOR portion from
> this driver all together.
I don't like this patch as is, as it seems like you are replacing the
VMMC regulator that actually exist in HW by parsing a DT property.
I think mmc_of_parse_voltage() shall *only* be used when the OCR mask
(->ocr_avail) can't be fetched by using a regulator. Typically that's
when the VMMC voltage levels are managed within the mmc controller
itself.
I don't have a strong opinion on how you solve that, but I guess you
have two options.
1.
Make sure the driver can be build and used both for CONFIG_REGULATOR
and !CONFIG_REGULATOR. What you need to take care of then, is to
assign the ->ocr_avail mask to a default value in the case when it
can't be fetched from a regulator. Most mmc drivers has some kind of
fall-back mechanism like this.
For those SoC where you need/can control the VMMC regulator, make sure
those enables CONFIG_REGULATOR to get the proper behaviour by
omap_hsmmc.
2.
Force omap_hsmmc to be build with CONFIG_REGULATOR.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists