[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB4PR02MB272917ED7AC857977C006CDD6820@DB4PR02MB272.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:21:54 +0000
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"vgupta@...opsys.com" <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] serial: 8250_dw: Add UPF_SKIP_TEST to flags depend on
device tree
From: Peter Hurley [mailto:peter@...leysoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:21 PM
>>On 07/22/2015 05:34 AM, Noam Camus wrote:
>> From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
>>
>> Add support for OF option "no-loopback-test"
> Changes to devicetree need to at least get acks from DT maintainers.
I will add them in my v2
Should I take this patch apart from this set or should I add DT maintainers to whole set?
Noam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists