[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150723190214.GK25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:02:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:54:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > That would be bad, how can we force it to emit 5 bytes?
>
> .byte 0xe9 like we used to do in static_cpu_has_safe().
Like so then?
static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool inv)
{
unsigned long kval = (unsigned long)key + inv;
asm_volatile_goto("1:"
".byte 0xe9\n\t .long %l[l_yes]\n\t"
".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
_ASM_ALIGN "\n\t"
_ASM_PTR "1b, %l[l_yes], %c0 \n\t"
".popsection \n\t"
: : "i" (kval) : : l_yes);
return false;
l_yes:
return true;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists