[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150723190258.GL25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:02:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jasonbaron0@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel broken on processors without performance counters
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:33:36PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > That would be bad, how can we force it to emit 5 bytes?
> hmm....I don't think that's an issue, the patching code can
> detect if its a 2-byte jump - 0xeb, or 5-byte: 0xe9, and do
> the correct no-op. Same going the other way. See the code
> I posted a few mails back. In fact, this gets us to the
> smaller 2-byte no-ops in cases where we are initialized
> to jump.
Ah yes, I looked right over that.
I think that if we want to go do that, it should be a separate patch
though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists