[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B72EEA.5020600@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:27:38 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
CC: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
"Fabian Frederick" <fabf@...net.be>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] power: reset: at91: add sama5d3 reset function
Le 20/07/2015 18:42, Sebastian Reichel a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> This patch introduces a new compatible string: "atmel,sama5d3-rstc" and
>> new reset function for sama5d3 and later chips.
>>
>> As in sama5d3 or later chips, we don't have to shutdown the DDR
>> controller before reset. Shutdown the DDR controller before reset is a
>> workaround to avoid DDR signal driving the bus, but since sama5d3 and
>> later chips there is no such a conflict.
>>
>> So in this patch:
>> 1. the sama5d3 reset function only need to write the rstc register
>> and return.
>> 2. we can remove the code related with sama5d3 DDR controller as
>> we don't use it at all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>
>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>
> queued.
Sebastian,
As my Device Tree changes depend on this modification, we can
synchronize in tree ways:
1/ you provide me a stable branch so that I can pull it before applying
my changes that can go through arm-soc.
2/ you let me take the driver's modifications with me and the two
patches of the series would go through arm-soc.
3/ you take the second patch of my series with my Acked-by tag and carry
both of them up to Linus' tree.
Please tell me your preference.
Thanks, bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists