linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] MODSIGN: Use PKCS#7 for module signatures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:03:11 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Luis Rodriguez <mcgrof@...il.com>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MODSIGN: Use PKCS#7 for module signatures

Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:

> How would it cause kexec problems?  I can only see it being a problem
> if Authenticode can't handle authattrs, right?  There shouldn't be any
> legacy PKCS7 kexec images whatsoever, because no existing kernel will
> boot them or generate them.

I was wondering if it is possible to get an mscode message that doesn't have
authattrs in it.  I guess we can just ignore the possibility until the matter
arises, if it does, and deal with it then as appropriate.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/