[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728125545.GC2564@lukather>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:55:45 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Timo Sigurdsson <public_timo.s@...entcreek.de>
Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com, wens@...e.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
pawel.moll@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and
board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chen-Yu Tsai schrieb am 27.07.2015 15:14:
> >> ChenYu (in the CC), since you did most of the original work here, do
> >> you know why we have an op at 0.9 volt, but none of our boards allow the
> >> voltage to go that low in the regulator settings ?
> >
> > I'm on vacation now, so apologies for the bad formatting.
> >
> > The OPPs are from a common subset
> > of the settings from the fex files available
> > at the time. Some fex files actually set
> > min and max voltage thus eliminating
> > the highest and lowest OPPs.
> >
> > At least that is how Maxime and I
> > interpreted them.
>
> IMHO for a common maximum opp that's a good approach. But for the lowest
> frequency setting, it would seem more logical to me, to raise the voltage
> to a point where all boards will run fine with them, unless those boards
> cannot handle the frequency regardless of the higher voltage.
Agreed.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists