linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150729133529.GI20130@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:35:29 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	peter.lachner@...el.com, norbert.schulz@...el.com,
	keven.boell@...el.com, yann.fouassier@...el.com,
	laurent.fert@...el.com,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System
 Trace Module devices

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:25:10PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:

> There has to be a way to defer stm_probe(), although a quick look at
> amba code suggests it's not implemented.

What makes you say this?  Probe deferral is implemented in the driver
core rather than individual buses, the buses don't need to know anything
about it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)