[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871tfrkree.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:46:49 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
peter.lachner@...el.com, norbert.schulz@...el.com,
keven.boell@...el.com, yann.fouassier@...el.com,
laurent.fert@...el.com,
"linux-api\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:25:10PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>
>> There has to be a way to defer stm_probe(), although a quick look at
>> amba code suggests it's not implemented.
>
> What makes you say this? Probe deferral is implemented in the driver
> core rather than individual buses, the buses don't need to know anything
> about it.
I stand corrected, it indeed is.
So returning EPROBE_DEFER from stm_probe() should Just Work (provided
stm_probe() handles its error paths correctly).
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists