[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150730100908.GI2564@lukather>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:09:08 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Peter De Sc hrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
Hi Heiko,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > Also we can try to see if critical clocks aren't being forced on by
> > > applying this patch and looking for clk_get() failures
> >
> > And that shows that the CPU and DDR clocks are not protected, which
> > obviously is pretty mad.
> >
> > I've mass converted all our probing code to use OF_CLK_DECLARE, and
> > make things work again.
> >
> > http://code.bulix.org/5goa5j-88345?raw
> >
> > Is this an acceptable solution?
> >
> > We were already moving to this, I'm not really fond of doing this like
> > that, but I guess this whole debacle makes it necessary.
>
>
> did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
>
> Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
any news since that mail.
I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
situation worse for the time being).
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists