[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150811223409.GN2839@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:34:09 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Peter De Sc hrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >
> > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> >
> > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
>
> To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> any news since that mail.
>
> I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> situation worse for the time being).
>
Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
can merge the defer part.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists