[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BA45A2.8050909@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:41:22 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the NMI mess
On 24/07/2015 23:08, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> user_icebp is set if int $0x01 happens, except it isn't because user
> code can't actually do that -- it'll cause #GP instead.
>
> user_icebp is also set if the user has a bloody in-circuit emulator,
> given the name. But who on Earth has one of those on a system new
> enough to run Linux and, even if they have one, why on Earth are they
> using it to send SIGTRAP.
You do not need either "int $0x01" or an ICE to set user_icebp = 1. You
can use the 0xf1 opcode, which is kinda like 0xcc but generates #DB
instead of #BP.
The historical name is ICEBP because in-circuit emulators used it for
software breakpoints, just like your usual debugger used 0xcc aka int3.
And just like 0xcc it's unprivileged, so you can actually get a SIGTRAP
with asm(".byte 0xf1").
So...
> In any event, user_icebp is only set if user_mode(regs), so it's safe
> locking-wise. But please let's delete it.
... it's safe, but it has some use (!).
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists