[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55BAA17F.1070305@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:13:19 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
CC: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add clock subdevice node
information
On 07/22/2015 10:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-07-21 20:07 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>:
>> This patch updates the binding documentation for optional
>> clocks node and related information for buffered 32KHz clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> +Cc Stephen Boyd (clocks)
>
> We had a discussion whether clock bindings should be put in MFD
> bindings documentation or into separate file in bindings/clock but
> either way is fine for me:
No patch? :)
I think Rob has been pushing for MFDs to document everything within one
file, but either way is fine from clk perspective.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists