linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add clock subdevice node information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+BuhbHgnYi6HfAJx986vtDuUJzbxBRgivX9pF1GhUSvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:21:56 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add clock subdevice node information

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 07/22/2015 10:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> 2015-07-21 20:07 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>:
>>>
>>> This patch updates the binding documentation for optional
>>> clocks node and related information for buffered 32KHz clock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 28
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> +Cc Stephen Boyd (clocks)
>>
>> We had a discussion whether clock bindings should be put in MFD
>> bindings documentation or into separate file in bindings/clock but
>> either way is fine for me:
>
>
> No patch? :)
>
> I think Rob has been pushing for MFDs to document everything within one
> file, but either way is fine from clk perspective.

I don't recall that exactly. I did say that child bindings need to
point back to the MFD binding. So this is fine with me:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/