[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803061556.GS5096@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:15:56 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Wang, Biao" <biao.wang@...el.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arve@...roid.com" <arve@...roid.com>,
"riandrews@...roid.com" <riandrews@...roid.com>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Di" <di.zhang@...el.com>, "Li, Fei" <fei.li@...el.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] staging: android: lowmemorykiller: imporve lmk to
avoid deadlock issue
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:53:22AM +0000, Wang, Biao wrote:
> Consider the following case:
> Task A trigger lmk with a lock held, while task B try to
> get this lock, but unfortunately B is the very culprit task lmk select to
> kill. Then B will never be killed, and A will forever select B to kill.
> Such dead lock will trigger softlock up issue.
>
> This patch try to pick the next task to break this loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Biao <biao.wang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Di <di.zhang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
I don't really feel comfortable saying I reviewed this code. I just
commented on a few process issues. I don't know the subsystem well
enough to give it a seal of approval.
> Reviewed-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists