[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803091624.GZ2564@lukather>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:16:24 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: public_timo.s@...entcreek.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mailing List, Arm" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] ARM: dts: sunxi: Raise minimum CPU voltage
for sun7i-a20 to a level all boards can supply
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:35:51AM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Timo Sigurdsson
> <public_timo.s@...entcreek.de> wrote:
> > sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20 boards
> > (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the
> > voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can actually use
> > it.
>
> Surely it wouldn't be added here if some could supply 0.9v.
>
> Is the code that uses this smart enough to sensibly switch between two
> operating points with the same frequency and different voltages? If
> so, maybe just add a 144MHz @ 1.0v operating point?
And how would it choose between the two exactly ? Switch to the 144MHz
@ 0.9V and see if it works ? If it doesn't you might have screwed your
system already, and might not be able to recover from it at all.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists